the unobservant anthropologist

everything from random babbling to intellectual thoughts mixed with anthropology, technology, and culture

Posts Tagged ‘favorite’

Developer-centric tech conferences as a (design) researcher

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on March 19, 2008

Back in February I attended the Future of Web Apps (FOWA) in Miami and BarCampMiami held in the same venue. My boyfriend is a developer so he wanted to attend this conference. I decided to go with him since it was semi-close to home and I wanted to learn more about the tech industry.

Essentially, my experience at FOWA was doing participant observation of the developer side of the tech industry. A large part of the speakers and materials covered was over my head since I have a limited knowledge but I learned a lot. I did walk away learning like I knew a bit more about their processes but more importantly I feel like I gained insight into their world. The majority of the talks focused on the development process and excluded user-centered research, or mentions of users in general. To be fair, the audience was likely interested in the former more than the later. I commented to someone that FOWA felt very developer-centric and lacked a focus on users. Their response was something to the effect of “users aren’t part of the process.” To be sure, they *should* be.

BarCampMiami was useful in that the presenters only focused on the basics of what they were discussing, i.e. OpenID, OAuth, etc. I actually learned about the subjects they presented rather than gained insight into the tech industry.

Last week I attended SXSW Interactive in Austin, TX and BarCampAustin. My experience at BarCampAustin was similar to that of Miami and I learned a lot (and had fun, BarCampAustin rocked!). SXSW was a different experience from FOWA for me though. In addition to gaining insight into and about the development process of web apps, software, etc. I became inspired by listening to the developers talk about their research.

This process of listening to people talk about their experiences to gain insights in/for research is nothing new if you’re familiar with anthropology. In listening to the developers, etc. discuss their research I discovered/thought of many ways that anthropological research could help their processes and goals. This is good knowledge to have when you’re looking for internships (me ;) or if you want to do consulting work.

All and all, I really enjoyed FOWA, SXSWi, and both BarCamps. Given that most practicing/applied anthropologists will have a professional counterpart (for tech design research it’s designers/developers, for medical anthropology maybe it’s doctors, for educational anthropologists it’s teachers, etc.) and I believe that attending your counterparts’ conferences, etc. will be very valuable for you to be able to communicate with that communicate.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

What my Twitter network means to me

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on December 12, 2007

There has been much buzz around Twitter, what Twitter means, what Twitter is, etc. in the last day. (Twitter is a microblogging social network site.) Yesterday @jowyang did a great blog post about this and it sparked a firestorm of of chatter on Twitter, blogs, etc. One thing that came from it (and I believe that’s what Jeremiah intended with his post) was a surge in people adding new Twitter friends. Someone in my friend list coined the term “friend ninja” to mean following someone because another friend said hello to them and another friend later shortened it to “FNJ.”

I thought I’d give my two cents about Twitter today. It’s something I’ve been meaning to write, but I’m feeling inspired after what another friend called “Twitter Tuesday.” I’ve illustrated as many points as I could in this post with links back to either specific tweets (posts on Twitter) or Twitterers. Now, I’ve written before about Twitter(here, here, here and here) but I haven’t shared too many thoughts about it.

For months I’ve realized that Twitter is of incredible value to me:

  • Since I work and go to school online I’m home by myself all day, everyday, and there are days that I don’t leave the house. Twitter keeps me company.
  • Also a result of working from home, I sometimes become uninspired or I feel like I’m becoming stagnant. Twitter inspires me.
  • Sometimes I run into problems or need to discuss an idea. Twitter becomes a dialog.
  • I can talk about anthropology with people (something I don’t get to do all that often ;)
  • When a new invitation-only beta launches and I need an invite, Twitter becomes my entry in.
  • Twitter has really become a source of news. I don’t pay quite as much attention to my RSS now, I read Twitter.
  • I learn about new events and meetups, both local and nationally.
  • I’ve made face-to-face friends on Twitter and I’ve become friends with people that I hope to meet someday.
  • I’ve gotten to know face-to-face friends better through Twitter.
  • Twitter has also become a way for me to update my family about my life because they now check Twitter everyday :)
  • It’s also a pragmatic tool; your favorite tweets can be reference in iTweet from the iPhone. When I’m standing in front of the beer case at the grocery or at a new bar, I look at my “Good beer:” tweets that I’ve favorited ;)
  • When I travel my friends also offer me recommendations of where to eat or what to do if I’m in a city where they are familiar with.

I have a poor memory (hence my organizational skills!) but I’ve always had a knack for remembering tidbits about people (hence I’m an anthropologist). While I sometimes find it hard to keep track of my ever-growing number of friends, I do remember bits and pieces about almost everyone of my Fritters (Twitter friends). (added Dec 13 – some of my friends call their Twitter friends ‘tweeps‘ – I love it!) I like to hear their stories; the events, their thoughts, the day-to-day, etc. It’s all interesting to me (even the boring parts). On Twitter I’m exposed to people I would never otherwise know; parents (can you believe I do not have face-to-face friends with kids?), older people, younger people, real estate people, PR people, publishers, social media specialists, teachers and students, international friends (my feed is never quiet, someone is always up somewhere), and the like. It’s amazing!

This diversity is both intentional and unintentional. Since Twitter has added the tracking feature I track things I’m interested in as well as things I’m becoming interested in (like HCI). But, for the most part, my friend list has developed organically and unintentionally.

In 2007 we had two (with) Twitter births, a Twitter wedding, a Twitter suicide threat, people making true friendships (by the traditional definition), people being diagnosed with cancer, people changing jobs, hacks to work around Twitter faults, trends & memes, third party apps, and so much more. I’m looking forward to seeing if Twitter will continue to thrive in 2008 or if it will be out (sorry- I’m watching Project Runway as I write this!).

Find me on Twitter: @jencardew
I’d love to hear your thoughts, experiences, comments about Twitter and leave your Twitter name in your comments (which I have to moderate because my blog is loved by spambots).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | 7 Comments »

The “graduate experience” and UNT’s online master’s program in anthropology

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on December 6, 2007

Since I’ve never attended graduate school in an on-campus program, much of what I see as the “graduate experience” comes from hearsay and others’ experiences. Part of my hesitation about enrolling in the online master’s program was about if I’d get the “graduate experience” (whatever that is).

Well, a year and a half into the program I feel like I can say I am getting it- at least a part of it.
As I’ve written about in the past, I’m a research assistant for my advisor in the department. I’ve had two opportunities to present at conferences so far from this research and publications are in the works. So, this is part of the “experience.”

UNT and the department of anthropology have made efforts to extend other parts of graduate school to the online students also though. Many on-campus students are presenting their practicums this week and next. At UNT students do a practicum (applied project with a client) instead of a thesis. The department is recording these presentations and will upload them for the online students to view. Some presentations will also be available in real-time via a teleconference line and Live Classroom (which is sort of like a desktop sharing app). I thought this was a neat idea.

Another thing that the on-campus graduate students have done for the online is to hold the graduate anthropology club meetings in a room that has a speaker phone and Live Classroom. The online students can attend the meetings virtually along side the on-campus students. This is cool because most of the time students will do short presentations about topics and discussion will follow.

Lastly, the Center for Distributed Learning (CDL) at UNT makes presentations available in real-time via Live Classroom. In about an hour I will be attending a talk by Darrell Hull from the College of Education speak on this topic:
“An experimental design study was conducted to examine participant interaction toward social knowledge construction and negotiated meaning in asynchronous online discussion. Different instructional methods were examined that show significantly enhanced group discourse processes. The presentation will focus on the measures used to examine this phenomenon and a Vygotskian theoretical framework that supports the interventions and measures used for the analysis.”

(I’m attending because of our online-on-campus research)

I’ve been rather impressed by UNT’s and the department’s efforts to include online students.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Communities of Practice & the internet

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on November 14, 2007

Yesterday I did a post about ‘Communities of Practice’ (CoP) that I feel could be of interest to applied/practicing anthropologists, anthropologists in the tech field, and design anthropologists.

I created the list as part of an assignment for my pre-practicum course. The professor wanted us to find professional organizations that would serve as our CoP post graduation. For the sake of the assignment, professional organizations were pseudo-synonymous with CoP and vice versa. Professional organizations (the AAA and SfAA would be examples) are those that charge for membership and in return you receive benefits such as publications, and also networking opportunities.

I’m wondering how relevant these professional organizations really are in the age of the internet. There are many, many social networks that can be used to network both socially and professionally. Such networks are very accessible (if you have the internet), are free to join, take as much (or little) effort as you want to maintain, and there are no face-to-face conferences for you to be tempted to attend. Virtual social networks can also be a great way for shy or timid people to begin networking or for people to get to know people in other cities, etc.

Now, these social networks do not offer tangible membership benefits immediately, nor do they guarantee such results BUT if you maintain, nurture, and give to your network you can receive many benefits!

Will social networks replace what professional organizations have to offer? Well, the beautiful thing about social networks is that they are what you want them to be. If you are looking for professional development, connections, inspirations, relationships, job opportunities, etc. then find people to add that can offer those to you – and make sure you give back to them!

I do belong to professional organizations, but I’m not sure if I’ll renew my membership to most. I get more out of my social networks than those professional organizations ;)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Communities of Practice for Applied/Practicing (Design) Anthropologists (with a focus on the tech industry)

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on November 13, 2007

I’m currently taking a Pre-Practicum course at UNT. The course is meant to prepare us for doing our practicum, which is essentially a full applied anthropology research project in which we work directly with a client and it is in lieu of a master’s thesis (read practical, real world experience ;) .

This course has focused on professional development; resume, 30 second elevator speech of personal interests/experience, a research paper about your field of interest, grant writing, IRB, types of anthropological research, and communities of practice (CoP).

For the sake of the course, ‘communities of practice’ were essentially professional organizations e.g., SfAA or AAA. I felt this definition was rather limiting and somewhat ill-informed in the age of the internet (doesn’t account for social networks, etc.) but that was the definition we were told to work from. So, for the course, I compiled a list of CoP’s that I felt would be relevant to me (design anthropologist in the tech field). I thought I’d share the list with you since I spent so much time on it :) I’ve broken it into sections and put a “*” to denote organizations I belong to.

The idea of CoP is that you’ll have places to network, to stay informed about current trends, etc. and you’ll receive the benefits that said membership offers, such as newsletters, etc. However, a CoP is what you make of it and the reasons, benefits, etc. probably will vary by person to person.

Professional Organizations of Interest to Applied & Practicing Anthropologists

*American Anthropological Association (AAA)

*Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA)

*National Association for the Practice of Anthropology (NAPA)

*National Association of Student Anthropologists (NASA)

Consortium of Practicing & Applied Anthropology Programs (COPAA)

Local Practitioner Organizations (LPO)

Professional Organizations of Interest to Applied & Practicing Design Anthropologists

*Usability Professionals’ Association (UPA)

*AnthroDesign Listserv

Interaction Design Association (IxDA)

*Human Factors & Ergonomics Society (HFES)

Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA)

Design Research Society

User Experience Network (UXnet)

Updated December 9, 2007: This was a comment posted by a reader (to another related post) “As for your list, note that UXnet is not a professional organization like the others – you cannot join it as a member (only as a volunteer). UXnet is more about helping you make sense of all of the user experience CoP out there.” Thanks Keith, I appreciate your correction!

Professional Organizations of Interest to Applied & Practicing Design Anthropologists in Tech

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

ACM SIGCHI
you have to be a member of ACM

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Anthropological research can suck sometimes, why do we do it?

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on September 16, 2007

That was my thought last week as I looked back through my time cards from March – July and realized the amount of time I spent doing transcription over the last few months. I don’t like doing transcription, in fact, sometimes I despise it. Every time I’ve had to transcribe interviews, it’s been for a project with a linguistic focus (read super attention to detail and much harder transcription ;)

Despite my dislike for transcription, I realize it’s part of the research process (well, for grad students any way ;) and thus it is important. But than I thought about all of the hours that are a head of me coding those transcriptions. I like coding better than transcribing, but it’s not really “fun,” and on top of that, I’ve been staring at these interviews for nine months now and have read them all at least five times!

Well, the process does in deed suck sometimes, and that’s why we’re repeatedly told to only do research we love. I do love the research project I’m on and most days that’s enough to keep me going. But not always.

So what drives me? What causes me to push forward? What are my reasons for this seemingly self-torture?

I do anthropological research because I honestly believe that the outcomes may be (hopefully!) beneficial to others and this is why I am an applied anthropologist. As applied anthropologists we can work with the community to put the collected data into action, and the results can be very beneficial!

I’m not sure if it’s because I started out in an applied program, or if it’s the pragmatist in me, or what.. but I believe that it is very important to apply anthropological research. My hopes of helping is what keeps me going. I’m not sure that I understand what drives non-applied anthropologists, or other non-applied social scientists for that matter, to do research if no one will benefit from it… unless of course it’s an ego thing ;)

Posted in Ethics | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Software & Online Resources for Research summary of my 7 part series

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on September 16, 2007

I just finished my 7 part series about software and internet resources for research.
Part 1, “Inspiration for an Idea,” can be found here

part 2, “Literature Review,” can be found here,

part 3, “Research,” can be found here,

part 4, “Transcription”, can be found here,

part 5, “Analysis,” can be found here,

part 6, “Write up,” can be found here,

and part 7, “Publishing,” can be found here.

I hope to make the seven parts into wiki pages so that I can add resources as I learn about them and so that others may add their resources as well.

There are a few themes in almost each entry that I wanted to reiterate one last time. I mention the use of wikis and mind maps in many stages as a tool for organization, as well as maintaining PDFs in Yep.
Organization in research is very important and there are a lot of software and online tools that can help!

Related posts:
GTD – anthropology style
How to “network” as an (online) anthropology student

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

How to “network” as an online anthropology student

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on August 25, 2007

As an online graduate student I’ve been faced with the challenge of getting the same experience of “networking” and “learning the in’s and out’s of the discipline” that would normally come with being an on-campus student. The quotations I’ve used around networking are intentional because I do not (never ever) intentionally network and I’m fairly certain I would fail if I did. Rather, I’ve met a lot of people by just being myself- social, talkative, ambitious, interested to meet people for the sake of meeting them.

A friend, Celina Kapoor, recently pointed out that she felt like I was good at “networking” and that I have a good idea of how to go about being connected (in the sense of knowing what’s going on) in the field of anthropology. After some thought I composed a list of things that I do that I feel are helpful in these regards. I shared my list with my online peers at the recent UNT online orientation. I’ve included the list below because I think the tips are just as beneficial for on-campus anthropology students. Eventually I’d like to turn it into a wiki page because the list will really be an on-going project. I’d love to hear feedback and comments (jencardew at gmail dot com) if you have any!

*start document*

The following document was composed to offer suggestions on how to “network” as an online student, but all of the tips can be used by on-campus students and non-students alike. An added benefit from using these tools to network is that you are more likely to become more involved in the field of anthropology and to learn more about the field.

As a graduate student in an online program you may miss out on networking opportunities that on-campus students have, in the last year I have found ways to overcome this- some are obvious and some may not be. Each one takes time, however in my opinion it is worth it. Many of us will be entering into a new field of work, new job, etc. after graduation and one of the best ways to find a job is through networking. Also, I have found it helpful to just get to know other anthropologists, and anthropologists in your sub-field of interest specifically, because while you might not call on them for a lead on a job, you’ll have people to ask for advice, direction, etc. (don’t forget that your advisor can help with this too!) I have been active in all of the following activities, I’ve incorporated it into my routine, but I don’t spend much time on it.

blogs: read, comment and/or start your own (a blog is an online journal, visit this site for a more throughout explanation.)
o I have found that the anthropologists that blog are really friendly and happy to talk! A good way to enter into the “blogging community” of anthropology bloggers is to subscribe to blogs that cover topics you are interested in and to write comments as a response to posts that you have an interest in, opinion on, can add to, etc. This helps to open the dialogue and also is beneficial because you’ll expand your horizons!
o Visit this site to watch a short and simple video learn about subscribing to blogs via RSS (free notifications of new posts by the blogs you are interested in)
o If you would like to use a RSS feed reader to organize your blog subscriptions (it’s convenient and free!) I recommend Google Reader. There are directions on the website, and I would be more than happy to walk you through it if you need help!
o Here is a comprehensive list of anthropology blogs antropologi.info/blog/
o You can also search and find blogs using technorati
o Another great way to enter into this community is to start your own blog. There are a few different “anthropology blogging families”- mine Anthroblogs is run by John Norvell.
o By starting your own blog you’ll be in control of the topics discussed and people will seek you out to start a dialogue- it’s a small community, so it’s super easy to get involved and to get readers.
o You’d be surprised at the amount of people that could email you about what you write (I was contacted by a Canadian news reporter after having my blog for about 2 months)
o There are many free websites that offer free blogging tools that are simple and easy to set up- Word Press is (in my opinion) the easiest to use because you do not need to know any HTML, etc. they give you free templates. Blogger is another free site run by Google
o By being involved in the anthropology blogging community you’ll increase your chances of starting dialogues with people that have similar interests, but you’ll also start to just “get your name out there”
o Also, don’t limit yourself to “anthropology” blogs—what are related disciplines that you could learn more about and get to know people? i.e., design, education, public health

listservs (visit this site to learn about listservs)
o By joining one of the free email listservs you’ll keep up-to-date with happenings in your sub-discipline and you’ll learn more about others’ interests
o Once you feel comfortable, you can start posting discussion emails and/or responding
o If you see that someone posts discussions that you are interested in- email them off-list and start a discussion, people in general are super nice (and if they’re not, do you really want to talk to them?)
o Sometimes job postings and/or events are announced- pay attention to ones in your area, etc. and attend!
o This website has a good list of anthropology listservs
o This is the AAA (American Anthropological Association) list of listservs

email
o In the past year I’ve seen people’s websites, etc. and emailed them a question i.e., can I see your syllabus for your course, etc.
o People are usually responsive, if not, don’t be discouraged though
o People like to talk about themselves ☺

LPO
o Local Practitioner Organizations
o These are regional groups made up of practitioners and applied anthropologists
o Some LPOs are active and have events, etc.
o Some are not as active, but still have a listserv (see listservs)
o A lot of LPOs will meet up at the bigger conferences, stay informed about such events and meet up with them! (see conference)
o See this site for an explanation of LPO and a list of LPO

anthropology associations
There are benefits to joining anthropology associations such as, discounted registration for conferences, newsletters, free publications, etc.
o The two main ones are:
o Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA)
o SfAA has a social network (see social networks)
o Look around on the website there is a lot of good resources!
o American Anthropological Association (AAA)
o Look around on the website there is a lot of good resources!

o Both the SfAA and the AAA have student focused organization/group of some sort
o Be active on the forums, listservs
o Run for office
o SfAA student
o AAA student

o The AAA has sub-sections i.e., NAPA
o It costs about $10 for students to join the sub-groups
o They meet up at the conferences (see conference)
o AAA interest groups

conferences: workshops, events, common areas
o The two main anthropology conferences are:
o The AAA in the fall (usually October or November)
o The SfAA in the spring (usually March or April)
o There are smaller conferences for smaller organizations
• Savage Minds has put together some info on anthropology conferences here
o There is a business anthropology conference called EPIC in the fall (usually October) EPIC
o Each conference has workshops (for an extra fee)
o Workshops are typically small groups of people and therefore easier to approach and talk to others- if they are in the same workshop, they might have similar interests
o Each conference also has “parties” hosted by various groups
o Attend ones that look interesting, people are usually very approachable!
o There are always student gatherings too, check the message boards
o Volunteer, it’s an easy way to get access to a lot of people and it’s an easy way to get involved in conversations (see podcasting)
o Hang out in common areas and just strike up conversations
o This is easy if you smoke ☺

classmates
o Get to know students that have similar interests, etc. and help each other out!

local universities
o Keep an eye on your local universities lecture series and attend if you see something that looks interesting
o A lot of dissertation defenses are open to the public, attend some anthropology ones
o See about joining their listsev or clubs – not sure if this is possible, but worth a try

podcasting
o Started at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the SfAA in Tampa, FL
o www.SfAApodcasts.net
o Volunteers have a lot of opportunities to interact with speakers in various ways
o Volunteers can volunteer for sessions that are of topical interest
o Also, you’ll have something to talk about at the conference ☺
o It’s a good way to get your name out too- volunteer information is included

social networks (visit this site to view a short, simple video and learn about social networks)
o There are many different social networking site and all are free to join
o Find people that have similar interests and engage in conversation
o Write a bio about yourself so that others can contact you!

o The SfAA has recently started a social network site
o There are student forums and interest groups
o It’s easy to message or comment to people
o It’s not too active yet (still worth your time though) so invite others to join!

o A lot of blogs have a web2.0 (social) feature of sorts (see blogs)
o anthropology.net
o Savage Minds

o One way to find social networks and groups that you are interested in is to search
o Yahoo groups
o Google groups

o Here are a few other ideas
o Linked In
o Live Journal
o Facebook

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Software review PDF database Yep (OSX)

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on August 7, 2007

I have two qualities that are a blessing and a curse: I’m hyper organized & I plan for the future. Over all I’m very happy that these two traits have naturally become a key part to how I approach life. However, I do consider them a curse at times because they are both super time consuming!

Anyhow, when I was helping to develop our syllabus for our design anthropology course this summer, I realized that I would be reading over 40 articles and would have to produce a paper in the end. This was a somewhat dizzying thought at first until I decided to organize the articles (all PDFs) along the way.

I’ve messed around with a few PDF database/organizing software products in the past and none of them met my requirements, until the recently updated release of Yep. Yep is software that is only OSX (Mac) (I switched to a Mac because of the software that is available!) compatible and costs $34 USD for the full version. There is a free trial version though! In my opinion it’s totally worth the $34.

Awesome features of Yep: you can tag articles and write a summary of them (however long you want), then you can search those tags and summaries to find what you need. This makes future referencing of articles for papers, etc. super easy.
Downfalls: only for OSX & the files have to be in PDF format (but the Mac has software that comes with it to allow you to convert to PDF easily).

For this design anthropology course we had to write an annotated bibliography of each article. So from week 1 I would read an article, write the annotated bibliography, then pull up the PDF in Yep, tag it with the appropriate tags and copy & past the bibliography into the description field. I use broad tags such as “history”, “introduction”, “methods”, “case studies”, “theory+analysis”, & “theory+approach”. I also use more specific tags i.e., “PD”, “CSCW”, “semiotics”, “McCracken”, “IDEO”, & “Wasson”.

I’m currently in the process of outlining my paper for design anthropology. It will be about 10 pages long and cover “what is design anthropology”, “history of design anthro”, “common methods”, “common theories of approach”, “common theories of analysis”, “how design anthro is different from academic anthro”, “how design anthro is beneficial to design” and the “pro’s and con’s of design anthro”. If this seems like a lot of topics, it is, but each topic will only have about half a page or so. For each topic I use the search feature on Yep to see which articles I should work from. As I write I’m realizing which tags should be added or removed from certain articles and adjusting accordingly. Yep is making the process of writing a paper that references 40 articles super, duper easy!

I love the new version of Yep so much that I’ve gone back through my old PDFs and tagged them too. Maintaining the PDFs once a week this summer (adding them, tagging them, & writing the description) was so easy that I will continue this process moving forward.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

Dialogue Between Pratitioners & Applied Anthropologists and “The Profession of Practicing Anthropology”

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on April 27, 2007

A subject that keeps coming up in my classes at UNT is that of “practicing anthropologists (practitioners)” and “applied anthropologists”. The distinction, according to some, is that “practitioners” work solely in the private sector and “applied anthropologists” work in both academia and the private sector. We read a few articles this semester in my theory course about what both terms mean to people, where and why the divide came about, and the lack of dialogue between the two. I find this topic to be very interesting. I think its in part due to the fact that I want to be a “practitioner” but I see the importance of keeping in touch with “applied” anthropologists- mostly due to my interest in theory and “being in the loop”.

A few months ago my quantitative methods professor tasked us with finding a social/educational program on the web and developing a program evaluation plan for it. I chose Making Business Management a Profession, from an article I read in Fast Company. The gist of the article is: Devi Vallabhanneni, a Harvard MBA graduate, believes that business managers should be held to the same standards as professionals. By this, Vallabhanneni means that business managers should be certified through a series of tests that evaluate a person’s knowledge of the skills needed to practice as a person of that profession; e.g., the bar for lawyers, etc.

From this article I got the idea of a “certification for anthropological research”. I think it’s kind of a neat idea– and while I haven’t done a lot of research into it, I think it’s something I might look into a bit further. I’ve made a vow to myself to try to work on establishing a dialogue between “practitioners” and “applied anthros”.

Here’s a snip from my paper (I’ve uploaded the full paper- it’s about program evaluation methods):
“Anthropological methods are becoming more popular in the private sector, and currently there is not a way of determining who has the qualified skills to utilize such methods other than a degree in anthropology. Employers can seek to exclusively hire trained (people with degrees) to conduct anthropological fieldwork, however exceptions may be made for people that have enough experience with such methodologies. In the world of practitioners what qualifies someone as an “anthropologist” and will unqualified people claiming to be anthropologists hurt the reputation of the discipline?
It has been suggested (see Goldschmidt, Baba, Nader *) that there is a lack of communication between practitioners of anthropology, those working exclusively in the private sector, and applied/academic anthropologists. If such a divide does exist and conversations of theory and current trends are not taking place between academia and the private sector, how will a qualified practitioner that has graduated keep up-to-date with the discipline? If a certification program for “practicing anthropologists” were to be created, people qualified to conduct anthropological fieldwork would hold a certification. Announcements could be made to businesses seeking to hire anthropologists that such a certification is available and they could be encouraged to hire only certified researchers.
Additionally, certified researchers could be held to the code of ethics established by the association (perhaps the NAPA could oversee the certification, in which case the NAPA code of ethics could be used). In order to keep practitioners in communication with non-practicing anthropologists, certified practitioners would be encouraged to publish research in a peer-reviewed journal (or perhaps a shorter publication to make the effort more realistic) and to take part in continuing education programs where current theories and musings would be emphasized. In theory, the certification and continuing education would help to lessen the gap between the academy and practitioners, encourage practitioners to conduct ethical research and lessen the chance of non-qualified people conducting anthropological research incorrectly and tarnishing the reputation of the discipline.”

Download Paper

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Ethics | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »