the unobservant anthropologist

everything from random babbling to intellectual thoughts mixed with anthropology, technology, and culture

Posts Tagged ‘Life’

National Blog Posting Month (NaBloPoMo)

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on November 2, 2007

It’s that time of year again! To participate in NaBloPoMo all you have to do is post one blog post every day in the month of November. This year, a Ning network has been created for participants to gather in. There are currently over 4700 members in the group and there are some active discussions in the forums. Some groups have formed within the community and I joined the “Circle of Jens” group :)

I participated in NaBloPoMo last year and found the fact that it occurs in November to be both a blessing and a curse. November is a very busy month for me (and most people really) because of my birthday, Thanksgiving, school winding down, and the AAA conference. November is a month when I have a lot to talk about, but little time to do it. This is why I’ve accepted the challenge this year- I’m determined to make time! I also have a rather long list of blog posts to write, it’s become very easy for me to put an idea on the list and never make time to write it.

Much more to come…. every day this month :)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

Anthropological research can suck sometimes, why do we do it?

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on September 16, 2007

That was my thought last week as I looked back through my time cards from March – July and realized the amount of time I spent doing transcription over the last few months. I don’t like doing transcription, in fact, sometimes I despise it. Every time I’ve had to transcribe interviews, it’s been for a project with a linguistic focus (read super attention to detail and much harder transcription ;)

Despite my dislike for transcription, I realize it’s part of the research process (well, for grad students any way ;) and thus it is important. But than I thought about all of the hours that are a head of me coding those transcriptions. I like coding better than transcribing, but it’s not really “fun,” and on top of that, I’ve been staring at these interviews for nine months now and have read them all at least five times!

Well, the process does in deed suck sometimes, and that’s why we’re repeatedly told to only do research we love. I do love the research project I’m on and most days that’s enough to keep me going. But not always.

So what drives me? What causes me to push forward? What are my reasons for this seemingly self-torture?

I do anthropological research because I honestly believe that the outcomes may be (hopefully!) beneficial to others and this is why I am an applied anthropologist. As applied anthropologists we can work with the community to put the collected data into action, and the results can be very beneficial!

I’m not sure if it’s because I started out in an applied program, or if it’s the pragmatist in me, or what.. but I believe that it is very important to apply anthropological research. My hopes of helping is what keeps me going. I’m not sure that I understand what drives non-applied anthropologists, or other non-applied social scientists for that matter, to do research if no one will benefit from it… unless of course it’s an ego thing ;)

Posted in Ethics | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

How to “network” as an online anthropology student

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on August 25, 2007

As an online graduate student I’ve been faced with the challenge of getting the same experience of “networking” and “learning the in’s and out’s of the discipline” that would normally come with being an on-campus student. The quotations I’ve used around networking are intentional because I do not (never ever) intentionally network and I’m fairly certain I would fail if I did. Rather, I’ve met a lot of people by just being myself- social, talkative, ambitious, interested to meet people for the sake of meeting them.

A friend, Celina Kapoor, recently pointed out that she felt like I was good at “networking” and that I have a good idea of how to go about being connected (in the sense of knowing what’s going on) in the field of anthropology. After some thought I composed a list of things that I do that I feel are helpful in these regards. I shared my list with my online peers at the recent UNT online orientation. I’ve included the list below because I think the tips are just as beneficial for on-campus anthropology students. Eventually I’d like to turn it into a wiki page because the list will really be an on-going project. I’d love to hear feedback and comments (jencardew at gmail dot com) if you have any!

*start document*

The following document was composed to offer suggestions on how to “network” as an online student, but all of the tips can be used by on-campus students and non-students alike. An added benefit from using these tools to network is that you are more likely to become more involved in the field of anthropology and to learn more about the field.

As a graduate student in an online program you may miss out on networking opportunities that on-campus students have, in the last year I have found ways to overcome this- some are obvious and some may not be. Each one takes time, however in my opinion it is worth it. Many of us will be entering into a new field of work, new job, etc. after graduation and one of the best ways to find a job is through networking. Also, I have found it helpful to just get to know other anthropologists, and anthropologists in your sub-field of interest specifically, because while you might not call on them for a lead on a job, you’ll have people to ask for advice, direction, etc. (don’t forget that your advisor can help with this too!) I have been active in all of the following activities, I’ve incorporated it into my routine, but I don’t spend much time on it.

blogs: read, comment and/or start your own (a blog is an online journal, visit this site for a more throughout explanation.)
o I have found that the anthropologists that blog are really friendly and happy to talk! A good way to enter into the “blogging community” of anthropology bloggers is to subscribe to blogs that cover topics you are interested in and to write comments as a response to posts that you have an interest in, opinion on, can add to, etc. This helps to open the dialogue and also is beneficial because you’ll expand your horizons!
o Visit this site to watch a short and simple video learn about subscribing to blogs via RSS (free notifications of new posts by the blogs you are interested in)
o If you would like to use a RSS feed reader to organize your blog subscriptions (it’s convenient and free!) I recommend Google Reader. There are directions on the website, and I would be more than happy to walk you through it if you need help!
o Here is a comprehensive list of anthropology blogs antropologi.info/blog/
o You can also search and find blogs using technorati
o Another great way to enter into this community is to start your own blog. There are a few different “anthropology blogging families”- mine Anthroblogs is run by John Norvell.
o By starting your own blog you’ll be in control of the topics discussed and people will seek you out to start a dialogue- it’s a small community, so it’s super easy to get involved and to get readers.
o You’d be surprised at the amount of people that could email you about what you write (I was contacted by a Canadian news reporter after having my blog for about 2 months)
o There are many free websites that offer free blogging tools that are simple and easy to set up- Word Press is (in my opinion) the easiest to use because you do not need to know any HTML, etc. they give you free templates. Blogger is another free site run by Google
o By being involved in the anthropology blogging community you’ll increase your chances of starting dialogues with people that have similar interests, but you’ll also start to just “get your name out there”
o Also, don’t limit yourself to “anthropology” blogs—what are related disciplines that you could learn more about and get to know people? i.e., design, education, public health

listservs (visit this site to learn about listservs)
o By joining one of the free email listservs you’ll keep up-to-date with happenings in your sub-discipline and you’ll learn more about others’ interests
o Once you feel comfortable, you can start posting discussion emails and/or responding
o If you see that someone posts discussions that you are interested in- email them off-list and start a discussion, people in general are super nice (and if they’re not, do you really want to talk to them?)
o Sometimes job postings and/or events are announced- pay attention to ones in your area, etc. and attend!
o This website has a good list of anthropology listservs
o This is the AAA (American Anthropological Association) list of listservs

email
o In the past year I’ve seen people’s websites, etc. and emailed them a question i.e., can I see your syllabus for your course, etc.
o People are usually responsive, if not, don’t be discouraged though
o People like to talk about themselves ☺

LPO
o Local Practitioner Organizations
o These are regional groups made up of practitioners and applied anthropologists
o Some LPOs are active and have events, etc.
o Some are not as active, but still have a listserv (see listservs)
o A lot of LPOs will meet up at the bigger conferences, stay informed about such events and meet up with them! (see conference)
o See this site for an explanation of LPO and a list of LPO

anthropology associations
There are benefits to joining anthropology associations such as, discounted registration for conferences, newsletters, free publications, etc.
o The two main ones are:
o Society for Applied Anthropology (SfAA)
o SfAA has a social network (see social networks)
o Look around on the website there is a lot of good resources!
o American Anthropological Association (AAA)
o Look around on the website there is a lot of good resources!

o Both the SfAA and the AAA have student focused organization/group of some sort
o Be active on the forums, listservs
o Run for office
o SfAA student
o AAA student

o The AAA has sub-sections i.e., NAPA
o It costs about $10 for students to join the sub-groups
o They meet up at the conferences (see conference)
o AAA interest groups

conferences: workshops, events, common areas
o The two main anthropology conferences are:
o The AAA in the fall (usually October or November)
o The SfAA in the spring (usually March or April)
o There are smaller conferences for smaller organizations
• Savage Minds has put together some info on anthropology conferences here
o There is a business anthropology conference called EPIC in the fall (usually October) EPIC
o Each conference has workshops (for an extra fee)
o Workshops are typically small groups of people and therefore easier to approach and talk to others- if they are in the same workshop, they might have similar interests
o Each conference also has “parties” hosted by various groups
o Attend ones that look interesting, people are usually very approachable!
o There are always student gatherings too, check the message boards
o Volunteer, it’s an easy way to get access to a lot of people and it’s an easy way to get involved in conversations (see podcasting)
o Hang out in common areas and just strike up conversations
o This is easy if you smoke ☺

classmates
o Get to know students that have similar interests, etc. and help each other out!

local universities
o Keep an eye on your local universities lecture series and attend if you see something that looks interesting
o A lot of dissertation defenses are open to the public, attend some anthropology ones
o See about joining their listsev or clubs – not sure if this is possible, but worth a try

podcasting
o Started at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the SfAA in Tampa, FL
o www.SfAApodcasts.net
o Volunteers have a lot of opportunities to interact with speakers in various ways
o Volunteers can volunteer for sessions that are of topical interest
o Also, you’ll have something to talk about at the conference ☺
o It’s a good way to get your name out too- volunteer information is included

social networks (visit this site to view a short, simple video and learn about social networks)
o There are many different social networking site and all are free to join
o Find people that have similar interests and engage in conversation
o Write a bio about yourself so that others can contact you!

o The SfAA has recently started a social network site
o There are student forums and interest groups
o It’s easy to message or comment to people
o It’s not too active yet (still worth your time though) so invite others to join!

o A lot of blogs have a web2.0 (social) feature of sorts (see blogs)
o anthropology.net
o Savage Minds

o One way to find social networks and groups that you are interested in is to search
o Yahoo groups
o Google groups

o Here are a few other ideas
o Linked In
o Live Journal
o Facebook

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

I’m off to California, but I leave you with this funny comic

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on June 25, 2007

I’m headed out to California for two weeks. If you’re interested, you can follow my adventure on my Twitter feed if you are interested. I’ve also added the Twitter app on my facebook page.

Also, if you haven’t checked out PhD (Piled Higher & Deeper) comics, you really, really should; it’s hilarious and a great way to waste time. Their latest comics has to be one of my all time favorites and I think most of you will get a kick out of it too. LINK

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

The importance of not reproducing aspects of academia and politics that you disagree with.

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on April 25, 2007

About an hour ago I read a post on Afarensis about Shelley Batts’ legal troubles with Wiley over one of her blog posts in which she explains, or rather writes about, data presented in a Wiley journal. The specific aspect of her post that is (wrongly) in question by Wiley is the chart and graph in the post.

Essentially what Batts is doing is providing free advertising of the data in the article and ultimately for the authors and publisher. In my opinion, and the opinions of many of the commenters on various blogs, there is nothing wrong with what she has done. She presented the data, the chart, the graph and offered some commentary. She didn’t slander the data or anyone associated with it, nor did she take credit for their work. However, it appears as though some folks at Wiley disagree with her use of a chart and graph in the post. In my opinion, Wiley really, really should find better ways to use their resources, rather than bullying a PhD candidate at U of M into taking down visual elements that support her blog post that was dedicated to an article in their journal. It’s absolute silliness.

So what does the “The importance of not reproducing aspects of academia and politics that you disagree with” part of the blog post mean? Well, it is in reference to myself. My initial reaction was to get up on my soap box (see above) and shout about how I feel this is completely ridiculous. However, before I could login to my blog I had a thought; “what could this mean for me?”. Now, I know that this is totally selfish and I now realize that it was actually completely out-of-character for me. BUT it happened and I want to share the rest of the process. In a hypothetical situation, what could jumping into a role of advocate for a fellow blogger (I don’t know her- but aren’t we all in this together :) against a publisher mean? Well, it could make a publisher mad at me (they are clearly not busy doing real things, but rather cruising the blogosphere for little guys to pick on).

Aspects of the habitus of academia are to accede to bureaucracy, abide by the “rules”, and to get through grad school without pissing anyone off. I’ve never been very good at doing any of these things- reason #1 why I’m in an online program… to stay as far away from the academy as I can. So, why should I start being mindful of these things now? What’s really on the line?

My conclusion; I’m not going to censor myself in order to stay under the radars of the more-powerful than I. It’s unlikely that this post would draw such attention- so it’s really the principle of the matter. By censoring myself, by being mindful of the ways of academia that I disagree with, and giving in- I’m reproducing those qualities. How will anything in academia (the bad of course, not the good) change if we surrender and reproduce those qualities? And, most importantly to me, how will I live with myself if I become a “reproducer” of these qualities?

Another passing thought before I end this self-reflection, I’ve never branded the podcast project as an open access project for fear that people may misunderstand the movement, shy away from the project, and (at worst) shut the project down. Although my intent for the project is by no means to start the movement within anthropology, I avoided the mentioning of it (after I realized that it does indeed have a small bit to do with it) for strategic reasons, with the thought that if “open access” was associated with the podcasts people might disapprove of it. In a way it was a very political thing to do- and again, out of my character. Blah. I need to take more moments of reflection if I’m going to stay true to myself in the very influential world.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Google Maps Mash Up- Job Search by location and discipline

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on April 19, 2007

It’s that time of year again- final papers are due. In a true procrastinator spirit, I was reading my blogs versus writing my theory paper and stumbled upon an awesome Google Maps mash up. It’s a mash up of Google Maps and job searches that is available in an RSS feed. Best of all, if you typed in “anthropology” jobs actually come up ;) I’m not sure what’s cooler- the fact that there are actual jobs in anthropology (not all academic by the way) or the fact that “anthropology” was actually recognized within the search!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

GTD- Anthropology style

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on February 28, 2007

In case you’re not savvy, GTD stands for getting things done and the concept is rather self-explanatory. I would go so far as to say it’s a popular trend and it seems to be based off of a book by David Allen. While I haven’t read the book, I am a big fan of productivity and efficiency.

I feel like one of my strengths is my ability to draw connections where others might not see them. That’s a rather bold statement for me, but I’ve been told by many others I have that trait, and let’s face it, that’s what social science trains you to do.

So, I’d like to share some of the GTD concepts I’ve gathered through my anthropological training.

Theory. Strong training in anthropological theory, or any theory for that matter, helps to make situations easier to approach and evaluate. While learning the theory isn’t easy for most, it helps later in life- trust me. As an example: I struggled with the dilemma “do you chose a client and then the focus OR the focus and then the client?” for about a year. I’m concerned about this because my practicum (thesis) is staring me in the face even though it’s at least a year away. Enter Singer’s Community-Centered Praxis (1994). Singer suggests that researchers should let the community chose their own focus in their research (there’s more to it than that). While I might not adopt his approach, it could answer my question if I want it to. Point is, others’ have come before you and made similar mistakes- do your literature review: follow their led or at least learn from their mistakes. Let theory guide your decisions because it may help to make them easier and thus quicker to make. Also, let it guide your analysis, there’s a million different ways to interpret things. My approach is a hodge-podge ranging from Nader to Singer to Bourdieu to Foucault at this point.. but that’s OK.

Literature reviews. While they just might be one of the dullest and most time consuming aspects of research- they’re vital. Unless you want to test for validity or reliability there really is not much sense in re-doing what was done correctly (emphasis on correctly!) the first time. And this saves you time in the end. It will also save you time by not having to defend your work to those more knowledgeable than you. At the AAA this past year, there was a session where it quickly became evident to a lot of the attendees that the group had not done their (literature) research. It may take that group a lot of time to repair their image now and I’m sure they’ve spent a fair amount of time (beyond that day) defending themselves.
Now of course, this is all subjective. In the vast field of medical anthro it might not be as easy to do a thorough lit review and/or there may not be over-arching agreed upon theories. But on this particular day the design anthropologists in the room showed the importance of lit reviews.

Organizing your files. After reading LeCompte and Schensul’s Analyzing & Interpreting Ethnographic Data last semester, I was inspired to organize the files on my computer. There’s a section in the book about organizing field data and while it’s helpful, I think you have to learn that by experience. What I got out of the book was the importance of organizing my own personal files on my computer. I do this for two reasons: it makes referencing things quicker and easier and it gives me practice for when I have to manage field data.

My personal files are organized by steps in the research process so that when I do a research project I can reference the materials I’ve collected and chosen as great along the way. I hope that this will save me the hassle of having to re-find the things I’ve read in school and I’ll probably have a pretty good database by the time I graduate. If an article assigned in class is good- I put it into my “research file” and I also try to tag it on del.icio.us if I can. I also have a benefit from my classes being online because all class discussions and lessons are electronic- if they’re good, I can save them and file them away.

My “research folder” consists of:
*Lit reviews= instructions on how to do an abstracts, etc
*Research HowTo- data collection methods, IRB examples, Informed consent examples, etc
*Analysis- tutorials in atlas.ti, spss, coding instructions, etc
*Transcription- linguist transcription keys, tutorials, software, etc
*Ethics- AAA guide, certifications, etc
*Writing- style guides, etc
*ToRead- articles that I’ve enjoyed, etc
*My Abstracts- I’ve written in courses that I think I’ll use again

I’m actually trying out yep software, it’s $34 (free trial) and is for OSX. It’s a document database that allows for tagging, or “coding” if you will, so I’m tagging sections of documents for easy future reference. I’ll post a review when I’ve had some more experience with it.

People skills. As anthropologists, we learn the art of establishing rapport. I see this as being helpful in “non-research settings” because we learn better people skills. But you can also use “real life” to strengthen your rapport building skills. You can also read a few (non-anthro) books about the subject strengthening your people skills and apply that to field work. It applies in research and life- two birds with one stone.

If I think of more tips- I’ll post a part II. If you have some tips- please share!

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

Happy New Year

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on December 31, 2006

I’ve had a very relaxing, and much needed, month off from school and my busy schedule.
But now, I am back to it!

I’m currently working on putting together the http://studentanthro.blogspot.com/ website. I hope to have something up and running soon… so make sure to check the site for updates and the “new look”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

List of International Faux Pas

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on November 10, 2006

I don’t know if this list is faux real (sorry- I had to do it! It’s more like I’m not sure how complete it is). Via Boing Boing, there is a list on Wikipedia of faux pas in different countries.

It is a very entertaining list, but my favorite is one for Hungary: Simple generalizations about Eastern Europe are considered incorrect and confusing Hungarians with Russians is even more incorrect. I think it would be nice if the US had a widely held belief that making simple generalizations about any group of people would be a faux pas.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

It’s my birthday!

Posted by Jen Cardew Kersey on November 8, 2006

I’m officially 24. To celebrate my birthday, I’ll be reading about Laura Nader for my Thought & Praxis course. Since I’m stuck doing school work today, I suppose that I am happy it is her and not some excruciating theorist such James Clifford or Foucault.

My very generous family has given me money to attend the AAA conference next week. I guess you know you’re getting older (and geekier?) when you ask for money to attend a conference!

AND- as I was writing this post, CNN announced that Donald Rumsfeld has resigned. Best damn birthday present. Ever!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »